Ep. 329 - The Informer - Part 3

0:47Vyzygoth: Well here we are back at the Grassy and Old and you're going to be listening to this on remitradio.org, pascoradio.org and also local radio in the East Pasco County area that's AM 1610. WDCX. Back with us for a third show is the I-Man. We call him the Informer. You can go to the website informerarchives.com and on that page click on Informer and you'll hear, well you'll read a lot about what we're speaking to today. And thanks very much for coming back on again, I-Man.

1:22The Informer: Yeah, thanks. I enjoy it. At least I can get some of the thing out over the airways rather than through the mails.

1:30Vyzygoth: Well, yeah, it's good to do both, by all means. I mean, they both resonate one with the other, but I think you do get a wider audience when you do have it on a radio or TV or whatever. Right. And since, I was going to say, community TV seems to be going away, nickel candy, we're still trying to keep things going with local radio, pirate radio, and also the internet, which is a great boom for as long as they don't tax us into oblivion. That's true. All right, what are we talking about today?

1:55The Informer: OK, this is still on the crown. I had wrote this up so I could disperse it on the show and the crown is actually what controls the country and in the crown they have, now the crown is not the king to be quite frank on that so that the people don't think when I say the crown they're talking about the king or queen of England. What is the crown? group of men that set together and became the exchequer of the king.

2:35The Informer: In other words, the bankers, the money lenders, and so on and so forth. And they have total control. And part of the money lenders and the crown today is the Federal Reserve in this country. And just about any of the banks of any country this started is under the control of the crown because the crown is the banks or are the banks. So with that what I have to do is start out that the bank, the crown, they've got to have lawyers or legal people so on and so forth and that's what they have now. They're called the temple.

3:19The Informer: So the crown has a temple just like the judiciary system in this country, there's lawyers. And there's different types of lawyers. So in this one, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and the Bar Association franchises come from the four inns or temples of the court from the Crown. They're the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These inns or temples are exclusive and private country clubs. They're secret societies, actually, in the world of commerce. They're established and founded early in the 1200s.

4:03The Informer: And the Queen of England are current members of both the inner and the middle temple. Gray's Inn specializes in taxation, legalities by rule and code for the crown. And the Lincoln's Inn received its name from the third Earl of Lincoln around 1300. If you read Charles Warren's book, The History of the American Bar, you will see that he goes back to the year 1355 when bar associations became known throughout the world. That's when they finally sunk their teeth and became an entity.

4:42The Informer: Now, just like all the US-based franchise bar association, none of the four ends of the temple are incorporated, and for a definite reason. You can't make a claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They're private societies without characters for charters, no statutes, and all their constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a public front door, unless you're called to them. Now what I did, and all your people can get this, you can find out about the the middle and inner temples and so on by writing to, I'll find it right here, writing to the American Inns of Court Foundation 127 South Payton Street Suite 201 Alexandria Virginia 22314 and in the The caption page says the American Inns of Court Foundation is a central information source for all American Inns of Court.

5:57The Informer: The Foundation office urges you to take advantage of the member services and benefits available to your American Inn and its members. Furthermore, if you should have any questions or require more information on any aspect of American Inns of Court, please contact the Foundation office, which I just gave you the address. I got this from Everett Gaskins in Hancock and Stevens from Raleigh, North Carolina, and they faxed me a copy for when I requested everything in there about the ends of court in North Carolina. So they gave me that and then I went to the Secretary of State's office in 1998 and they gave me the American is, of course, foundation in Durham, North Carolina, and it says contributions are deductible, and it has a classification as an educational organization, no assets, no income amount, and the filing requirements as a Form 990 gross receipt do not exceed $25,000.

7:07The Informer: A group affiliation is subordinate with the group ruling. That's all that is on the Secretary of State's office concerning the ends of court. There's one in Greensboro, North Carolina. There's one in Cary, North Carolina. And then, of course, they have the Bar Association itself as an educational organization. And its principal activity, it's interesting, other instruction and training, study and research, legal aid to indigence.

7:40The Informer: an asset amount is ten million dollars, an income amount is three million dollars and again it's an independent organization or an independent auxiliary and of course they don't tell you this but they come from the British Crown. So based on that while the inner temple holds the legal systems franchise to steal from Canada and Great Britain, the middle temple has its legal license to steal from America. This comes directly through their bar association franchises of the middle temple through the crown temple.

8:17Vyzygoth: Would you say again who has the license in this country?

8:21The Informer: The middle temple of the crown. Now, the history of the inn later centuries written by the society of the middle temple, you can see the direct tie to the bar association franchises and its crown signatories in America. And here's a quote. Call to the bar of keeping terms in one of the four Inns is a prerequisite to call at King's Inn until late 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and many from the West Indian Islands. The Inns records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston, that would be, I'm assuming, South Carolina, who had not studied here.

9:06The Informer: Five of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence were middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, America continued to come here until the War of 1812." So that means that all licensed bar attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or called to the bar at any of the King's Inns. And they have an oath and a pledge in terms of allegiance to the Crown Temple. It's not to the United States. It's not to you. Not to me. because we're the bottom of the pecking order when it comes to the attorneys.

9:43The Informer: Their first allegiance and duty is to the court, the second is to the public, which means the government, and the third is to you. So every one of us that hires a lawyer takes backseat to whatever it's done, and he has to go with what the judge says sitting up on the bench. That's his boss. If he tells them to shut up, he shuts up. If he says, I'll find you in contempt at court for this, well, he knows that he's on thin ice. So with that and known, it's a real island to know that the middle inner of the Crown Temple was publicly acknowledged that there were five Templar attorneys under Solomon that signed the Declaration of Independence.

10:27The Informer: So that means that both parties to the declaration agreement were the same origin, the Crown Temple. If you don't understand the importance of this, then there's no international agreement or treaty that will ever be honored or will ever have lawful effect when the same party signs as both the first and second parties. Just like the banks, they front both sides of any war. It's merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same, and that's what it is. That's what the fraud has been pulled on the American people. So in reality, the Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members. They're the only ones that signed it.

11:11The Informer: Now, example, Alexander Hamilton, he was one of the numerous Crown Templars who was called to their bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, and that was funded by the London's King's Inn, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to Washington during the American Revolution. In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and in six months he had completed a three-year course of studies. That's pretty good, right? He passed his examinations and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was and is the franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle End.

11:57Vyzygoth: The New York bar?

11:59The Informer: Yes. In fact, New York has a total different aspect than any other city in the country, and it's really the seat of all the power because of the crown.

12:13Vyzygoth: Does that, again, I know I'm bad about this, so if you would just answer this and then get back to where you were going, because I know I'd take you down roads other than the direction in which you wish to go. Is there any kind of, is it a coincidence that the New York bar would have the power it does in the United States and that also the New York Federal Reserve Bank also is the biggest 700 pound gorilla in the country?

12:40The Informer: Yeah, and that's why all the other things that happened in there, Wall Street and whatnot, because that particular part of it, you can find that in Charles Warren's book, The History of the American Bar. But there are certain sections on that that are on ATG Press if they go to it and look at the American Bar. And you can read excerpts from Charles Warren's book in there. Now, what happened was in 1783, the session, he settled down to practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton Esquire. In February of 1784, he wrote the Charter IV and became the founding member of the Bank of New York. That's the state's first bank.

13:25The Informer: Now you see, that wasn't the state's first bank, but it wasn't the state of New York bank. It was private. They just, we'll set up a bank in New York and we'll call it the first bank in New York.

13:37Vyzygoth: Alright, so there was nothing state about it except the title.

13:42The Informer: Right, that's all. So he secured a place in New York delegation at the Federal Convention in 1787. And he gave a five hour speech on June 18th. And it was titled, an executive for life will be an elected monarch. That's a quote.

14:02Vyzygoth: An executive of the?

14:04The Informer: Executive for life will be an elected monarch.

14:07Vyzygoth: But what does he refer to when he says executive?

14:11The Informer: The president. In other words, the president of the United States would be a monarch. And that's what Patrick Henry, if you go read in the Virginia Debate, 1787, he says it's squinched towards monarchy. And that's why none of the anti-federalists would go for it. So what happened was when he signed the Constitution for the United States representing New York State, that was one of the crown legal states, because it was a colony at the time.

14:49The Informer: So what happened was, a lot of people don't realize this, but Alexander Hamilton was of Jewish descent and black. His father was Levine, and he changed his name before he went to the island of Nuevas. That's where they ended up. There's a big plaque down there and a big monument for Alexander Hamilton. And he changed his name to Hamilton came to West Indies and married a mulatto named Rachel Fawcett and then they had Hamilton.

15:27The Informer: Hamilton went over back to be gleaned in Europe through the crown to be the front man into the United States that they knew was going to be created so that he could bring in the first bank. That's that simple. Now, let's just try to think.

15:55The Informer: What he did was when he came back, we all know the duel between Burr and Hamilton, and the reason why that was is because Burr kept chiding Hamilton of being a black Jew all the time.

16:14Vyzygoth: and it just got to him so much that that's what perpetrated the dual and of course history shows that hamilton was killed by fire if i can ask you about something with regard to that view had burr had burr defeated hamilton in any kind of political situation did he win uh... i don't even know if they were on the same party burr obviously was vice president of jeverson Did Hamilton aspire to that office?

16:46The Informer: No, no. He was strictly made the Secretary of Treasury.

16:52Vyzygoth: Okay. I have to tell you, I lived about 500 feet above where they dueled, on the shore of the Hudson.

17:01The Informer: Oh yeah?

17:02Vyzygoth: A long story short, I mean, it was one of the places I lived. It's Weehawken in Hudson County, New Jersey. And as the story has it, Hamilton made a fatal mistake. I don't know if you read this or not, but when he won the toss, he decided which way to pace off. And he chose to pace off towards the mainland, which down there in Weehawken has the famous Jersey Palisades, sheer rock walls, right? Well, you know the neighborhood. Well, you know, he walks to the Palisades, and what happens is he turns around with a beautiful back trap behind him to frame him up as a target, and he looks into the glinting sun coming up over the East.

17:47Vyzygoth: You might want to rethought that, Alex. But honestly, the two of them were rather sinister characters, weren't they? And they kind of cancelled each other out.

17:56The Informer: Right. Interesting. Well, okay, what happened was Washington elected Hamilton as a US Treasury, and he alone laid the foundation for the first federal US central bank, secured credit loans through the Crown Banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the federal government over the hoodwinked nations of the Union. They had no idea. Hamilton never made it a secret. of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.

18:32The Informer: Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown colonies compromising New England were independent nation states, but they never were and they aren't today. They were and still are colonies of the Crown Temple through letters, patents, and charters. They have no legal authority to be independent from the rule and order of the Crown Temple. The legal state is the Crown Temple colony, and that's why the New York City became the Crown Temple's jump-off point and their base of operation, and that's why they're still out there today.

19:11The Informer: So the people of America, Queen of England, Britain, they don't own America, and the Crown Temple owns America through the deception of all those who swore an allegiance to the middle and temple bar. The crown bankers and the middle temple attorneys ruled through America all the contracts, all the unlawful taxes, and all the contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, and they're all strictly enforced by the completely unlawful, but legal, orders, rules, and codes of the crown temple. So our so-called judiciary in America is none other did you find anything where anybody resisted this or was very very uh... vocal uh... no and the reason why it is there was so much of a fraud is so big that uh... the people just didn't get it they didn't know what was going on let me just stop you right there what you just said is that not exactly

20:21Vyzygoth: the condition in which we find ourselves right now?

20:24The Informer: Exactly, yes. Because the people see all this Patriot Act being put out there, and all these other things that are going on, Homeland Security, and they ain't complaining. In fact, they're jumping on the bandwagon and saying, oh, we need more of it. I'll give up more of my liberties just to be safe. Well, they have given up so much of their liberties that they ain't safe.

20:48Vyzygoth: But here again, if you can make something big enough, Everybody thinks a conspiracy or some plan has to be small, minute.

20:59The Informer: It can be such a big thing and you can tell a lie long enough and everybody believes it.

21:07Vyzygoth: But actually the bigger it is the better because if you're in an elevator with an elephant you really probably don't know what you got yourself into. That's right. Let's go back to 1776.

21:22The Informer: Here's an old Latin maxim and Roman expression. Whoever owns the soil owns all the way to the heavens and depths of the earth. Well, in 1776, that's what, like Roosevelt in the World War, the bombing, that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. That's the year the Crown Colonies became Crown States. All right. The Declaration of Independence was legal. It wasn't lawful. It was signed by both sides of the representatives of the Crown Temple.

22:00The Informer: Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called states, as direct possessive as states of the Crown. That's why I had mentioned earlier in the last show, see the definitions to understand the legal trickery that was done. So the American people raked in. was hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. The proof that the colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word state to signify a, quote, legal estate of possession. End quote.

22:36The Informer: In other words, as you go back and look up East State, you will find even in Black's law dictionary that it is now taken on the term state. All right. Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution would have been written using the word states. By use of state, the significance of a government of an estate possession was legally established. If you go back again and look in the 1788 Virginia debates when Patrick Henry said what I'm paraphrasing now because I don't have the exact thing in front of me what right do you have talking to the Commission to say we the people when it should be we the states and he said that twice in there anybody can pick up the I think it was June 4th to the 8th in the Virginia debates of 1788 and you can pick it up maybe it might be on the internet I don't know but you'll see and they're exactly what he said.

23:47The Informer: So all the constitutional rights are simply dictated by the crown temple and enforced by the middle temple, which are bar attorneys, through the franchise and corporate government entity, aka the federal United States government. Now when a state citizen, and I'll put that in capitals, attempts to invoke his constitutional, natural, or common law rights in Chantery, their equity courts. He is told they don't apply. And we all know that. Why? Simply because a state citizen has no rights outside the rule and codes of the Crown Law. Because only a state citizen has natural common law rights by a paramount authority of God.

24:31The Informer: Now, it might sound confusing. I just use state citizen two different ways. It's the capitalization. that doesn't. So the people that compromise the citizen, the state, are recognized only within natural and common law as already established. That'd be God's law. Only a state citizen, now I'll capitalize it, can be a party to an action within a state court. A common state citizen, I'm going to say, instead of state citizen inhabitant. cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized by the state courts, a common man must be converted to a corporate entity.

25:15The Informer: That's why they have a legal fiction called a person. And you go and look in the Informer site and look up person. And that is the best definition that I could find from legal sources of what a person is, and a person is not in law the physical man. So now you know why they created the entity using all capital letters within birth certificates issued by the state. They convert the common lawful man to a person of a fictional legal entity subject to administration by state rules, orders, and codes.

26:00The Informer: Because there's There's no law within any rule or code. It's not a law, it's just a rule. Of course, rules and codes don't apply to the lawful man of the Lord, if you will say, but he must be converted to a legal person of fictional status because they're a fiction to begin with, and fictions can only deal with other fictions. They can't deal with a man, a physical state.

26:31Vyzygoth: So you can't cross, there's no there's no interrelationship between the two? Right. That's at least recognized?

26:38The Informer: Right, nothing is recognized. So the Chantry Courts are the Crown Courts where the decisions of so-called justice are decided by three judges. That's a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked the rule and code over all judicial courts. Every judicial court in this country is not Anything to do with his country, it's done with the Crown. It's held by the Crown. Here's a quote. It is held to be a settled rule that our courts cannot take notice of any title to land not derived from the state or colonial government and duly verified by PAC. Four Johns, Rep. 163, Jackson V. Walters, 12 Johns, Rep. 365, S.P.

27:29The Informer: The Crown Temple granted letters, patents, and charters for all the land and all the colonies in New England, and the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple, as the Queen is now. Since the people were giving their patents and charter corporations, the governors of the colonies had a hard time, especially concerning the Crown taxation. And the scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were granted independence. Remember, the Crown Templars represented presented both parties at the 1776 Decoration and not only there, but to the Treaty of Peace. Every one of them was an Esquire that signed it.

28:12The Informer: So you got one party signing both sides, don't you?

28:16Vyzygoth: Uh-huh.

28:18The Informer: Is that legal? If they say it is. Yeah, they say it is, right. That's under conquest. That's why they say it is.

28:25Vyzygoth: Right. They make the laws of it.

28:27The Informer: Now, the reason they had that declaration was recognized by international treaty law in order to establish the new legal crown entity of the incorporated United States of the Middle Temple or King George III agreed to in the Treaty of Paris. Quote, between the Crown of Great Britain and said United States. Well, wait a minute. The Crown of Great Britain is the same as the Crown of the United States. So there's the agreement right there that is totally a total fraud. So most important is the actual signatories of the Treaty of Paris. Like I said, they were all esquires.

29:09The Informer: So this legally signifies Officers of the King's Court, which are now known as Templar Courts for Crown Courts. So this is the same Crown Templar title given to Alexander Hamilton. So David Hartley, he was a middle Templar of the King's court representing the United States. John Adams, Ben Franklin, and John Jay. They were all the signatories for the United States and were also middle Templars of the Crown's court through the Bar Association. Plainly written in history proves again that Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement.

29:55The Informer: perfect and elaborate scam, huh? How are the American people ever going to know this? They don't. They don't go into research like we do and find out. They have no idea this is sitting in the background controlling them.

30:12Vyzygoth: You mentioned Patrick Henry's opposition to such.

30:16The Informer: Right.

30:17Vyzygoth: Was there a sizable number of people involved in government in that day?

30:22The Informer: Oh yeah, yeah. If you get stories, Anti-Federalist, it's called The Anti-Federalist, and it's edited by Herbert Storing, and it's a really good book. It's a complete Anti-Federalist book. Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Maryland, Virginia, and New York are all represented in here. It also gives the speeches of Patrick Henry. in the Virginia State Ratifying Convention. That's 1788. And they have numerous.

31:05The Informer: Agrippa is one of them from Massachusetts. They wrote another one was the minority of the convention. They all called themselves different names at the time. Then there's the essays.

31:23The Informer: there is the Pennsylvanian and what happened in one of the Pennsylvanians and also the letters called the Federal Farmer there was a big hullabaloo because they said Pennsylvania couldn't get down to the convention and they already passed everything without them being there so in the Pennsylvanian called the Minority Convention it says I'm quoting right out of Storings. The Congress might gloss over this conduct by construing every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes to be for the general welfare and therefore as of their jurisdiction.

32:07The Informer: And the Supremacy Laws of the United States is established by Article 6 and then goes on and talks about it and says, as there are no articles of taxation reserved to the state governments, Congress may monopolize every source of revenue and thus indirectly demolish the state governments. Well, they've done that now. For without funds, they could not exist. The taxes, duties, and excises imposed by Congress may be so high as to render it impractical to levy further sums on the same articles. But whether this should be the case or not, if the state governments are presumed to impose taxes, duties on the same articles with Congress, the latter may abrogate and repeal the laws whereby they are imposed upon the allegation. Now, those people knew at the time And they were coming in and saying all this happy stuff was going to happen and it was not right.

32:58The Informer: But the average American people, just like the average American people today, they could care less. They weren't involved. They didn't want to get involved. They just wanted to make their life and go on and get what they could and have all their worldly possessions that they had. They weren't worried about how government men who was taking over and ruin their lives to infinity.

33:27Vyzygoth: This happened under Jefferson's watch, is that true?

33:32The Informer: No, this was under Washington. This was October 12, 1787.

33:38Vyzygoth: Jefferson wouldn't come around until the third of the century.

33:46The Informer: In their thing, he's saying, dear sir, and he goes in and says, it is to be observed that when the people shall adopt the proposed Constitution, it will be their last and supreme act. It will be adopted not by the people of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, et cetera, but by the people of the United States. See, right there, they're telling you that they knew that the people, the common man and the state had nothing to do with the Constitution. creation, ratification, or whatever, and it was never ratified anyway.

34:17Vyzygoth: There's a Marxist, and despite the fact that he is such, wrote a book called Toward an American Revolution, and his name is Frisian, F-R-E-I-S-A, and he had some points which I had to take into consideration despite the fact that he thinks maybe Marxism is the answer, but he called it an elitist document. Would you agree with those terms?

34:41The Informer: He called the what?

34:41Vyzygoth: He called the Constitution an elitist document.

34:44The Informer: Yeah, that's what it was. It was created by the elite people who were the signers. The people didn't sign it. It was only those people who had money and they had the power and they actually owned land in Europe, Great Britain, France.

35:05Vyzygoth: Well, could you comment then though on the Bill of Rights? I mean, I think that is exceptional. How does that fit in with the whole idea?

35:11The Informer: The Bill of Rights was strictly for the United States. It was strictly for those people and not the common inhabitants. There were 207 inhabitants in the area called the United States for Washington D.C., what it is now. In other words, if you go and read the John Barron case, you will see that the Chief Justice comes right out and says, that the Bill of Rights was not made for the people of the states because those states had their own Bill of Rights and it was only for the United States.

35:45The Informer: And that's all the way up to the present year 2000 when I studied it and I found a book on constitutional law that goes through every case that was brought up which was never been overturned, the John Barron case.

36:01Vyzygoth: When you say it's only for the United States, are you defining the United States as you did before?

36:06The Informer: Washington, D.C. That's it. The United States is actually Congress assembled.

36:13Vyzygoth: So in other words, they granted themselves these rights?

36:16The Informer: Yes, they granted themselves that bill of rights, not the average common man on the street.

36:22Vyzygoth: And so they just indemnified them against certain kind of, I guess, dictatorial powers and such, but the rest of the people, as you and I are, we were swung in the wind.

36:35The Informer: Yeah, yeah, that's all.

36:37Vyzygoth: And still do to this day.

36:38The Informer: Uh-huh, still are, yeah. That's why they say don't bring in the constitutional rights. See, what they did, how they brought in the Bill of Rights into the states is under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. That's how they started to bring it in. And the case, the book, probably have to go to the library and get it. It is the Cases in Constitutional Law, the third edition, by Robert E. Cushman and Robert F. Cushman. It is Appleton Century Cross.

37:19The Informer: And it'll give you all the cases in constitutional law. And I'll give you the Library of Congress card number is 68-18704. The last time it was copyrighted was 1967. And they have, in the John Barron case, I'll open that, I just haven't had it here.

37:45Vyzygoth: It said... I tell you what, I may hold on a second for that. Right at that point, because they're telling me we haven't really done any business. I want to tell everybody this is the grass you know with us is the informers. You can go to the website informerarchives.com and you'll find his writings and let's talk about that now because you do have certain publications for purchase do you not?

38:09The Informer: Yes.

38:10Vyzygoth: Okay and I'm going to that right now. Now just to clarify you do have one volume of which one are you that is out of print.

38:22The Informer: Right.

38:23Vyzygoth: And I think you've addressed it before, but I'll ask you to do it again. Everything else is available?

38:27The Informer: Yeah.

38:28Vyzygoth: Okay. And also folks have asked very specifically about how to purchase such. And you had said that if anybody just puts in a notation on the money order or inside a letter that you heard this on a radio show, that you would what, give them 10% off the total? Right.

38:44The Informer: Right.

38:44Vyzygoth: Okay. All right. Anything else that you want to alert people to that you have under your name on that site?

38:53The Informer: Uh, no, that's about it. The other site is just right after mine is James Montgomery and that will go a lot more into the, um, uh, the crown. And cause he, he is doing a lot of the research in that and I let him do that. And I just kept on going on the taxes and the rest of the history and you know, putting it together, but Montgomery is a excellent researcher on that. In fact, I emailed you something over the other day on that.

39:24Vyzygoth: If you do go to the home page of informerarchives.com, which stands for Against the Grain, you can read his works. If you click on the link stated as Knowledge is Freedom, which is the upper one on the right hand column, and I don't want to put you on the spot, but just off the top of your head, do you know whether James has in the past or was willing perhaps to do some interviews?

39:49The Informer: I don't know, he was over here and as I said he was a truck driver and he's been put off of the road because he's got high sugar and he can't drive with high sugar so right now until he gets the sugar under control he's sitting home and that's the reason why he came up for a visit and I briefly mentioned to him about the radio show and As long as he's home, I think maybe he just might.

40:21Vyzygoth: All right, excellent. And I would ask you to broker that if you could. Sure. And I'll follow up on your directions. Thank you very much for doing that.

40:28The Informer: Okay.

40:28Vyzygoth: Now back to business. You were about to read to us.

40:30The Informer: Okay, the Barron v. Baltimore. That is 7 Peters, 243, 8 lawyers edition, 672. It's an 1833 case. All right. Chief Justice John Marshall delivered the opinion of the court. Here's one of the things he said. The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual states. Each state established the Constitution for itself, and in that Constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of his particular government as its judgment dictated.

41:17The Informer: The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they suppose best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their interests." Now that says a lot. And in here it said, It's worthy to remark too that these inhibitions generally restrain state legislation on subjects entrusted to the general government or in which the people of all the states feel an interest.

41:49The Informer: Now what they're talking about there is the ex post facto law and the ninth section restriction on state regulation which was no state shall blah, blah, blah, blah. That's the only other part. When they come down, see, John Barron was in Maryland, and when the government did something in their wharf there, they created a situation where, in paving the streets of Baltimore, it deserted their streams and everything, and the sanding gravel was deposited near Barron's wharf.

42:32The Informer: So he had sued them out, and the decision in the Barron has left an indelible impression on the development of civil rights. While today Barron would have bought his case under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the process of change by which parts of the Bill of Rights have come to be applicable to the states has been slow, uncertain, and confusing. While most rights in the Bill of Rights now do apply to the states, They do so only because they are essential to due process of law.

43:08The Informer: Therefore, when anybody comes in and institutes the Bill of Rights, you know what they say, don't bring that up in my court.

43:18Vyzygoth: But do you find that, you know, I wasn't paying attention before 2000, but even since that time that I have been paying attention, it seems that these complaints come up more and more often. Now is that just a flaw in my observation?

43:33The Informer: No, it's been there. Well, I don't know if you say a flaw in your observation, but if you don't follow the cases like we do, you wouldn't know. And there's, oh gee, I don't know how many cases that come back and I have them on my computer. And I wrote an article, I think, on that, on the Constitutional. I don't know if it's on HTG Press or not, but I do have it. It's quite lengthy. And it goes through every case that I dug up on the John Barron.

44:11The Informer: And you can shepardize the John Barron case, and you can follow all the cases all the way up and go to the library and pull every one of them. And it's right there. And it just, every one of the cases says, It has not been overturned to this day and the last case I saw was the year 2000. So right there when you look at the term United States all it means is doing business as or aka Congress. Because it says Congress assembled in the United States in the same way as the President. When he's announced he's announced The President of the United States is not the President of the United States of America.

44:56The Informer: Because if that were to happen, he would have to okay every one of the fifty governors' legislation. He'd be the top man it would go through. But he's not. He is the President of the United States. You just look on TV whenever he's announced, not the President of the United States of America. He's the President of the United States.

45:17Vyzygoth: But then what does that say about the relationship to the states then?

45:21The Informer: That says that the states at one time were supposedly, or this is what the myth is, independent. But they're not, because remember the Crown Temple owns them all. Even the United States, even Maryland and Virginia, which turned over part of their property or state to the Congress, was still all owned by the Crown Temple.

45:47Vyzygoth: You know I looked up that definition of state in blacks. I had that sixth edition which we talked about in that last show. But you know what's interesting too, and this goes back to the notion of what a state was prior to the Civil War, and it describes it as being capable of entering into international relations with other communities of the globe.

46:11The Informer: Now why would that happen when a state was supposed to be forbidden in the United States Constitution to attack privacy on the high seas and all this other stuff and that it couldn't create or start a war with a foreign country well simply because they're all owned by the Crown Temple so they can do whatever they want so in other words in one sense they were allowed to do commerce right but they could not do I guess battle or Right, they couldn't declare war against France. New York couldn't declare war against France. It would have to be the United States to declare war against France.

46:57The Informer: And Florida couldn't stop someone on the high seas for piracy. It would have to be the United States. The state only went out three miles and the United States went out as far as the international boundaries would let them go.

47:13Vyzygoth: Alright, so the United States went from that three mile demarcation point to the international waters.

47:20The Informer: Right.

47:21Vyzygoth: We don't even know about that today though, do we? No. We don't even look at three miles belonging to a particular state, do we? No. Okay. People have no idea. Okay.

47:35The Informer: Now, okay, let's get back to when you read Article 5, it says, to provide for the restitution of all its states, rights, and properties which have been confiscated belonging to real birdie subjects, end quote. That means the Crown Colonies were granted to persons and corporations of the Crown Temple through letters, patents, and charters, and the North American colonial land was owned by the Crown. The catch-all is in Article 4. It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value of sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.

48:16The Informer: Okay, so that means that since the Crown and its tempers represented both the United States as debtors and the Crown as a creditor, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all the debts of the former colonies, now called the legal crown states. Now, it sounds too good to be true, but the words scam and hoodwink can't begin to describe what has taken place. So, what debts were owed by the Crown Temple and their banks? As of 1883, in the contract between the King and the 13 United States of North America, signed in Versailles, July 16, 1782, in Article 1, here's what it states, It is agreed and certified that the sum advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan in the years 1778, 79, 80, 81, and the present 1782 amount to the sum of 18 million of leviors' money of France according to following 21 receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress given in virtue of his powers to win."

49:30The Informer: That's a quote. Now you know where the money is still owed. It's infinite. It will never drop off. That amount equals 18 million dollars plus interest that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through the Crown Bank loans of France. And it was signed, remember, by Benjamin Franklin, who was the middle Templar of the Crown.

49:55Vyzygoth: But that was a contract with France.

49:59The Informer: yeah there was a contract with france yet who else is a co-sign by do you remember the french dignitary was no i didn't get that but in additional six million the dollars was loaned to the united states a five percent interest on february twenty-fifth seventeen eighty-three so the crown bankers in the netherlands and france recalling in their debt repayment by future generations us that's how it's been ever since that's why you'll see uh... In the IMF, you have a BMF code, Business Minister file. They're all considered a business. And it's a DACA code 300.

50:42The Informer: And that is U.S. Treaty Great Britain money owed to it. It's right there.

50:49Vyzygoth: All right, so you're saying to this day, and I guess in perpetuity, that we will be in servitude to actually the bankers, right?

51:02The Informer: Yeah, to the Crown.

51:03Vyzygoth: To the Crown, but not only the Crown of Great Britain is what you just said. Are we looking now also at France and the Netherlands?

51:09The Informer: Oh yeah, yeah, because that becomes, if you look at the concession of England to the Pope, May 15th and 1215, that's when the charter of the fealty of the King John to the Pope Innocent and the Roman Church was witnessed before the Crown Templars As King John stated when he sealed it, he says, quote, I myself bearing witness to the house of the Knights Templars, end quote.

51:37Vyzygoth: And John was a Sovereign of England.

51:40The Informer: Yeah. So the particular words that they use there, especially charter, fielding, demur, and concession, they're all really, that's why I say it's very important to know what the definitions of the words actually mean, not what they're presumed to mean or what you think they mean or what they come to mean. Now, if you go and look in the Informer site under terms, not words, you'll find that if you pick up the Internal Revenue Code and you go back to the definitions, 7701A, Every one of those definitions starts with the term.

52:32The Informer: Right there clues you in that it is not the word that means this, it's the term that means this. And term and word is so much different, like night and day, that you wouldn't believe it. Most people, they have no idea. They think a word is a term, and term is a word.

52:55Vyzygoth: Well, let me do this if you don't mind, for those who are listening right now, whether or not they're on your site. But real quick, how you have broken it down from Black's, I guess, fourth edition. The term is a word or phrase, an expression, particularly one which possesses a fixed or known meaning in some science, art, or profession. And then underneath that you have words, symbols indicating idea and subject to contraction and expansion to meet the idea sought to be expressed. As used in law, this term generally signifies the technical terms and phrases appropriate to particular instruments or aptly fitted to the expression of a particular intention in legal instruments." And it says, see the subtitles following.

53:35Vyzygoth: If you could capsulize that for us, can you give us an example even of what would be a term and what would be a word even if it's the same word or term?

53:46The Informer: Okay. They have to say it's a term or a word in the statute. And that's what they do. So then you can take a word, which you'll find in the dictionary. You can go, oh, let's say capituli. You go to a Wedser's dictionary or any other dictionary and you look up the word capituli. That is the average meaning that the average person knows it to be. Now you take capituli and you say the term capituli and then you define it. That means that you have now taken the standard dictionary, throw it away, and look at what the statute definition is.

54:29The Informer: Just like when you go and look at the term United States in the Internal Revenue Code, and it will define it how they want it defined, and that's why they use term. That means that term is limiting. It cannot include anything else. That is why there's so much argument is the word includes and including, and everybody argues this and that and what it means, but if the word term is in there, you can say term limits the use of what they're defining and therefore it does not include and cannot include other things within the meaning.

55:13Vyzygoth: Alright, as I'm looking at this and now it's just hit me, duh, Well, when that term definition ends, in your website it says, in some science or a profession. So now I'm thinking as we all talk about how certain industries and businesses have their own lexicon. So what they've done with term is, you take a word, but then when you want to, let's say, have a designation, specifically to what you're doing, whatever that should be, whether it's the laws, it says science art, that's where it changes, isn't it?

55:48The Informer: Yes, that's where it changes.

55:49Vyzygoth: You're taking some kind of word, you're saying, okay, in this particular field, it has this designation.

55:58The Informer: Just like when they say domestic and foreign, in 7701A, I think it's three and four, domestic means to the United States. where the law is written. Foreign means to the states out in the union. And then when they say a corporation, you know, it's a domestic corporation, just like Bruce Shaver. Okay, let's look at that case. I'm going to stop right here because I know we probably don't have much longer to go.

56:29Vyzygoth: We're coming up on three minutes.

56:31The Informer: Okay. Bruce Shaver lived in Kings County. I have all the documents from Kings County, New York. and worked as a clerk, but that was to New York. That's a foreign. So when he had stock in the Union Pacific Railroad, the United States owned it. That is a domestic corporation. He had stock in a domestic corporation, was a foreign entity, and had to pay the amount of money that the IRS said he had to pay because it was a domestic corporation and he was a foreign stockholder. It's that simple. To the average person listening to this, it's like, huh, what? Well, you've got to understand the words and terms.

57:16Vyzygoth: Yeah, I mean, that gives another whole slant, even a deepening of the term legalese.

57:22The Informer: Right.

57:24Vyzygoth: All right. We're talking with Iman. He's the informer. You can go to informerarchives.com. That stands for Against the Grain. And you'll find his writings, and that's where I'm at right now, is he's talking about terms and not words and such. And I don't know, how do we do today as far as the goal that you set for covering information?

57:44The Informer: Well, let me see. That's not good. I'm down on page 6, and I've got to go to page 13, so I covered half of it.

57:55Vyzygoth: Well, I tell you what, I know it's painstaking, and you are being such, because it is important to be precise. And I'm very grateful, and I know the listeners are, for you to do this. One last thing, if you could, as we close out. Can you, if you have it at hand, one more take on the address of the American Inns of Court. Can you give it at again?

58:17The Informer: Oh, okay. The American Inns of Court. Let me get it right here. Okay, it's American Inns of Court Foundation, 127 South Payton Street. P-E-Y-T-O-N, Suite 201, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314. And you'll get their introduction in a little blurb of what it's supposed to be. Read it with a grain of salt because they're telling the myth of what they are when they're really not. They don't tell you that they're the crowned temple.

58:57Vyzygoth: Okay, all right, listen, we are out of time, we'll work up another segment if you don't mind, and we'll be doing as long as you be doing, and thanks very much again for being generous with your time, and for visiting the Crassey and all that, man.

59:10The Informer: Okay, thank you, God bless you, fuck you again. When I tried so quickly I went lickety-splitly Out to my old 55 As I pulled away slowly Cars and trucks Stars beginning to fade And I leave the parade Just to wish that I'd stayed I feel it's getting stronger Six in the morning, gave me no warning I had to be on my way